Who Gets The Dog Pets In A Divorce

Over 185 Years of Combined Experience Practicing.

Pets often hold a special place in our hearts, becoming cherished members of our families.

They provide emotional support, companionship, and joy in our daily lives, making their well-being a priority during significant life changes such as divorce.

Legally, however, pets are considered property in many states, similar to household items or vehicles.

This classification means that, unlike children, pets are not subject to custody arrangements in the traditional sense.

The specifics of how pets are handled in divorce proceedings can vary by jurisdiction, and understanding these nuances is crucial for pet owners going through a separation.

Legal Status of Pets in Divorce

In California, the law has evolved to recognize the unique status of pets. As of January 2019, California Family Code Section 2605 allows judges to consider the care of pets in divorce matter proceedings.

This law permits the court to assign sole or joint ownership of a pet, considering the well-being of the pet and which party takes primary responsibility for its care.

Despite this, pets are still fundamentally considered property. The specifics of how pets are handled can vary, but the overarching principle is that pets are not subject to the same custody arrangements as children.

Instead, they are part of the asset division process, with the court taking into account factors such as who primarily cared for the pet, who can best meet the pet’s needs, and any evidence of neglect or abuse.

Factors Considered by Courts

When determining who gets the pet in a divorce, courts consider several factors to decide which party is best suited to care for the animal:

  • Primary Caregiver During the Marriage: Courts look at who is responsible for the pet’s day-to-day care, including feeding, walking, vet visits, and general upkeep. The individual who consistently handled these responsibilities may be more likely to retain the pet.
  • Welfare of the Pet: The court considers which party can best meet the pet’s needs. This includes the ability to provide a stable home, financial capability to cover expenses, and the availability to spend time with the pet.
  • History of Pet Care: Any evidence of neglect or abuse by either party will significantly impact the court’s decision. A party with a history of mistreating the pet will likely be deemed unfit to retain custody.
  • Emotional Attachment of Children to the Pet: If there are children involved, their attachment to the pet is also a consideration. Courts may decide to keep the pet with the children to maintain stability and emotional support for them during the transition.

Potential Settlement Agreements

In many cases, it is beneficial for divorcing parties to settle pet custody outside of court to allow for more flexible arrangements tailored to the specific needs of the pet and the parties involved. Settling out of court with the help of a lawyer can lead to more amicable and practical solutions.

Here are some examples of potential agreements:

  • Shared Custody of the Pet with an Alternating Schedule: Similar to child custody arrangements, parties can agree to share custody of the pet, with the pet alternating between homes on a weekly, monthly, or other agreed-upon schedule. This can include visitation rights to ensure both parties maintain a bond with the pet.
  • Keeping the Pet in the Home Where the Children Primarily Reside: If there are children involved, it might be in the pet’s best interest to remain in the home where the children primarily reside. This arrangement helps provide stability for both the children and the pet.
  • Financial Arrangements for Pet Care: Parties can agree on financial responsibilities related to the pet’s care. This may include sharing costs for food, veterinary visits, grooming, and other expenses. Clear financial agreements help ensure the pet’s needs are consistently met.

Engaging a family law attorney can help facilitate these agreements, ensuring that they are fair, comprehensive, and legally binding.

A lawyer can provide valuable guidance and mediation services to help both parties reach an amicable solution that prioritizes the well-being of the pet.

State-Specific Laws and Precedents

In California, the legal landscape for pet custody during divorce has evolved to recognize the unique status of pets within families. This law permits the court to assign sole or joint ownership of a pet based on factors such as:

  • Care of the Pet: Judges can evaluate who has been primarily responsible for the pet’s day-to-day needs, including feeding, grooming, and veterinary visits.
  • The well-being of the Pet: The court can consider which party is better positioned to ensure the pet’s overall health and happiness.
  • Pet’s Attachment to Family Members: In cases where children are involved, the pet’s emotional attachment to the children can influence the court’s decision.

These state-specific laws highlight the importance of consulting with a family law attorney who understands the nuances of pet custody in divorce.

An experienced attorney can help navigate the complexities of these legal provisions to ensure the best possible outcome for both the pet and the pet owner.

Practical Tips for Pet Custody Disputes

Handling pet custody disputes during a divorce can be challenging and emotionally taxing. It’s essential to approach the situation with a clear strategy and understanding of the factors that courts consider. Here are some practical tips to help you get custody of your pet and ensure their well-being is prioritized throughout the process.

Documentation

Keep detailed records of who primarily cares for the pet. This includes logs of feeding times, veterinary visits, grooming appointments, and any other relevant activities. Evidence showing consistent and primary responsibility for the pet can be crucial in a custody dispute, helping to establish who has been the primary caregiver.

Mediation

Consider mediation to reach an amicable agreement regarding pet custody. Mediation allows both parties to discuss their concerns and preferences with the help of a neutral third party, facilitating a mutually satisfactory arrangement without the need for contentious court proceedings. This approach can lead to a more personalized and less stressful resolution.

Legal Advice

Consult with a family law attorney experienced in pet custody cases. An attorney can provide valuable guidance on the legal aspects of your situation, help you understand your rights, and represent your interests effectively during negotiations or in court. Legal expertise is essential in navigating the complexities of pet custody and ensuring the best possible outcome for getting pet custody.

Need Help with Your Dog During Your Divorce?

With over 185 years of cumulative legal expertise, our team is committed to straightforward, honest advocacy.

We understand the deep emotional bond you share with your pets and the importance of ensuring their well-being during a divorce. Recognizing the uniqueness of each situation, we tailor our services to help you achieve the most desirable outcomes for your furry friends.

Our skilled family law attorneys work cohesively, combining vast experience and efforts to provide the advocacy and counsel you deserve. We know you will have questions and concerns about the best approach to take in your case, and we are here to help resolve them every step of the way.

Contact us today at (619) 639-9898 to set up your free consultation or reach out to us online.

Let us help you navigate this challenging time with confidence and care, ensuring the best possible outcome for you and your beloved pets.

Please call or contact our office online to arrange for an appointment about your case today.

The Moshtael Family Law Team

Get to Know Your Attorneys!

Over 185 Years of Combined Experience Practicing.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or
situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.